Bilah Samping Artikel

Telah diserahkan
Februari 10, 2026
Diterbitkan
Juni 4, 2026
Unduh
Download PDF
Statistik
Baca Penghitung : 0Unduh : 0

Isi Artikel Utama

Abstrak

Penelitian ini menganalisis keabsahan distribusi imbal hasil Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) dalam protokol JitoSOL Liquid Staking di jaringan Solana melalui perspektif prinsip fiqih Islam Al-Kharaj bi al-Dhaman. Di tengah adopsi aset kripto yang pesat pada tahun 2026, Jito memperkenalkan distribusi keuntungan tambahan yang inovatif kepada pemegang token melalui MEV, yaitu nilai ekonomi yang diperoleh dari optimalisasi urutan transaksi dalam satu blok blockchain. Namun, mekanisme ini memicu perdebatan mengenai keadilan sumber pendapatan dan proporsionalitas risiko yang ditanggung oleh investor. Menggunakan metode penelitian normatif yuridis dengan pendekatan usuliyyah, studi ini mengkaji apakah pengembalian MEV dikategorikan sebagai pengembalian usaha yang sah (Kharaj) atau praktik manipulasi pasar yang dilarang (Najasy). Hasil menunjukkan bahwa distribusi MEV di JitoSOL dapat sejalan dengan prinsip Al-Kharaj bi al-Dhaman selama investor menanggung risiko kerugian sistemik dan slashing. Namun, titik kritis terletak pada transparansi sumber MEV; jika berasal dari strategi yang merugikan pengguna lain (seperti front-running), maka unsur berkah akan hilang. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan urgensi standarisasi tata kelola syariah dalam algoritma distribusi hasil digital.


Kata kunci: Al-Kharaj bi al-Dhaman, Imbalan MEV, JitoSOL, Solana, Liquid Staking.


 

Kata Kunci

Al-Kharaj bi al-Dhaman;Imbalan MEV; JitoSOL;Solana;Liquid Staking.

Rincian Artikel

Lisensi

Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Lia Indah Khilmina, Nurifa Laksmitasari Azizah

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Penulis yang menerbitkan naskahnya di Jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:

Hak cipta atas artikel apa pun di Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah oleh LP2M STAI Al Musaddadiyah Garut berlisensi di bawah Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 / CC BY-ND 4.0

Penulis mengetahui bahwa Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah berhak menerbitkan untuk pertama kalinya dengan Lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 / CC BY-ND 4.0

Penulis dapat memasukkan tulisan secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif naskah yang telah diterbitkan di jurnal ini ke dalam versi lain (misalnya dikirim ke tempat penyimpanan institusi penulis, penerbitan dalam buku, dll), dengan mengakui bahwa naskah tersebut telah diterbitkan atau pertama kali di Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah

Cara Mengutip
Al-kharaj Bi Al-dhaman Mengenai Pembagian Hadiah Mev di Jitosol. (2026). Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 5(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.37968/jhesy.v5i1.2074
Unduh Sitasi
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

Cara Mengutip

Al-kharaj Bi Al-dhaman Mengenai Pembagian Hadiah Mev di Jitosol. (2026). Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 5(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.37968/jhesy.v5i1.2074

Referensi

  1. Alipanahloo, Z., Hafid, A. S., & Zhang, K. (2024). Maximum Extractable Value (MEV) Mitigation Approaches in Ethereum and Layer-2 Chains: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Access, 12, 185212–185231. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3514375
  2. Azrak, T., & Hazaa, H. (2021). The profit/gain from islamic law of contract perspective and the issue of ownership risk (damanal-milkiyyah). Journal of Islamic Finance, Vol. 0 No.1(Faculty of Islamic Studies, Social Sciences University of An kara).
  3. Birton, M. N. A., Sholihin, M., & Muttaqin, M. (2022). Maslaha-Based Value-Added Statement. GATR Accounting and Finance Review, 7(2), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.35609/afr.2022.7.2(4)
  4. Budiyono, A. (2025). Wealth Distribution in the Islamic Economic System Conceptual Foundations and Their Relevance to Contemporary Economic Justice. Journal of Integrated Socio-Economic Systems and Islamic Finance, 84–91.
  5. Carré, S., & Gabriel, F. (2025). Liquid Staking: When Does It Help? Deploying Liquidity on Well-Designed DeFi Lending Platforms. JEL Classification, D47, G29, O3. https://www.kraken.com/learn/what-is-liquid-staking,
  6. Chitra, T. (2023). Towards a Theory of Maximal Extractable Value II: Uncertainty. ArXiv:2309.14201v1 [Cs.GT] 25. http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.14201
  7. Cong, L. W., He, Z., & Tang, K. (2023). Staking, Token Pricing, and Crypto Carry. Cornell University Johnson Graduate School of Management.
  8. Cong, L. W., Zhiheng He, & Ke Tang. (2025). The tokenomics of staking (NBER Working Paper No. 33640, Tran.). National Bureau Of Economic Research, (JEL No. C73, E42, F43, L86), 1–63.
  9. Dong, X., Litos, O. S. T., Tas, E. N., Tse, D., Woll, R. L., Yang, L., & Yu, M. (2025). Remote Staking with Optimal Economic Safety. http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.01896
  10. Dzulkepli, S., & Barom, M. N. (2021). Financial inclusion and the goal of distributive justice in Islamic economics. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.33102/jmifr.v18i1.330
  11. Ekonomi, J. J., Syariah, K., Novianti, T., Sakdiah, K., & Febriyanni, R. (2025). Implementasi Qawaid Fiqhiyyah Dalam Mengembangkan Produk Perbankan Syariah. JEKSya: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Syariah, 4(3). https://jurnal.perima.or.id/index.php/JEKSya
  12. Fadillah, M. I., Supriatono Purnomo, B., & Purnamasari, I. (2024). Islamic Economic Principles: A Critical Review of Capitalism and a Vision for Justice. Equity: Jurnal Ekonomi, 12(02). https://doi.org/10.33019/equity.v%vi%i.381
  13. Faishol, M. (2026). Kaidah Fiqh: Al-Kharaj bi Adh-Dhaman. Dewan Syariah Nasional – Majelis Ulama Indonesia. https://dsnmui.or.id/al-kharaj-bi-adh-dhaman/
  14. Fatiha, N., & Miftahus Surur. (2025). Maximizing financial potential: the shariah economics approach to time value in finansial management. JSE: Jurnal Sharia Economica, Volume 4 Nomor 2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46773/jse.v4i1
  15. Finkbeiner, C., & Almashaqbeh, G. (2025). SoK: Blockchain Oracles Between Theory and Practice. Cryptology EPrint Archive.
  16. Gogol, K., Fritsch, R., Schlosser, M., Messias, J., Kraner, B., & Tessone, C. (2024). Liquid Staking Tokens in Automated Market Makers. UZH Blockchain Center, Matter Labs(University of Zurich), 26. http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.10226
  17. Gogol, K., Kraner, B., Schlosser, M., Yan, T., Tessone, C., & Stiller, B. (2024). Empirical and Theoretical Analysis of Liquid Staking Protocols. Communication System Group, Department of Informatics, University of Zurich. http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16353
  18. Gramlich, V., Jelito, D., & Sedlmeir, J. (2024). Maximal extractable value: Current understanding, categorization, and open research questions. Electronic Markets, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-024-00727-x
  19. Ian Unsworth, Paul Dylan-Ennis, Othman Gbadamassi, Kollan House, Wassim Alsindi, & Nick Almond. (2025). CSD Progress Report One.
  20. Jito’s MEV Priorities. (2026). Https://Jito-Foundation.Gitbook.Io/Mev/Solana-Mev/Jitos-Mev-Priorities.
  21. Khilmia, A., & Rahmawati, L. (2022). Distribusi Pendapatan Perspektif M. Abdul Mannan dan Realisasinya di Indonesia. IQTISHADIA Jurnal Ekonomi & Perbankan Syariah, 9(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.19105/iqtishadia.v9i1.5665
  22. Kong, D., Li, X., & Li, W. (2024). Characterizing the Solana NFT Ecosystem. Hainan University, 766–769. https://doi.org/10.1145/3589335.3651478
  23. Kulkarni, K., Diamandis, T., & Chitra, T. (2023). Towards a Theory of Maximal Extractable Value I: Constant Function Market Makers. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2207.11835. http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.11835
  24. Lehmann, M., Held, A., Krysa, F., Prévost, E., Schinerl, F., & Vogelauer, R. (2023). Staking Your Crypto: What are the Stakes? Journal of Business & Technology Law, 19(1). https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/jbtl
  25. Malkhi, D., & Szalachowski, P. (2022). Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) Protection on a DAG. Chainlink Labs. http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.00940
  26. Nasrullah, & Muthoifin. (2024). Implementation of Fiqh Rules in Economic Transactions in Islamic Financial Institutions: A Literature Review Study. Demak Universal Journal of Islam and Sharia, 2(03), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.61455/deujis.v2i03.194
  27. Nurjamil, Syafe‘i, R., & Mustofa. (2024). Implementation Of Al-Kharaj Bi-Addhaman Rules In Sharia Syndicated Financing In The Perspective Of Sharia Economic Law. Res Nullius: Law Journal, 6(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.34010/rnlj.v%vi%i.11676
  28. Oderbolz, N., Marosvölgyi, B., & Hafner, M. (2024). Towards an Optimal Staking Design: Balancing Security, User Growth, and Token Appreciation. Ledger Journal. https://doi.org/10.5195/LEDGER.201X.X
  29. Purwanza, S. wahyu, Wardhana, A., Renggo, Y. renny, & Dkk. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Kombinasi: No. 370/JBA. CV. Media Saind Indonesia.
  30. Rahim, S., & Mohammed, M. O. (2018). Operationalizing Distributive Justice From The Perspective Of Islamic Economics (The International Islamic University Malaysia, Tran.). International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 26, no. 2(2), 415–442.
  31. Rasyid, F. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif: teori, metode, dan praktek (Epullah, Ed.; I). IAIN Kediri Press.
  32. Scharnowski, S., & Jahanshahloo, H. (2025). The Economics of Liquid Staking Derivatives: Basis Determinants and Price Discovery. Journal of Futures Markets, 45(2), 91–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22556
  33. Song, H., Wei, Y., Qu, Z., & Wang, W. (2024). Unveiling Decentralization: A Comprehensive Review of Technologies, Comparison, Challenges in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana Blockchain. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, US. http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.04841
  34. Thajudeen, K. S. (n.d.). Conventional Futures: Major Issues from Islamic Law of Contract’s Perspective.
  35. Tzinas, A., & Zindros, D. (2023). The Principal-Agent Problem in Liquid Staking. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, (National Technical University of Athens), 456–469.
  36. Xiong, X., Wang, Z., Chen, X., Knottenbelt, W., & Huth, M. (2025). Leverage Staking with Liquid Staking Derivatives (LSDs): Opportunities and Risks (U. University of Sussex, Tran.). Imperial College London, UK, 1–24. http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.08610
  37. Yakovenko, A. (2018). Solana: A new architecture for a high performance blockchain v0.8.13. https://solana. com/solana-whitepaper